Search results

At a time when misinformation, post-truths and conspiracies are undermining confidence in science, UNamur welcomes SPiN (Science & Philosophy in Namur), a new interdisciplinary research center that questions the place of science in society. Founded last September by Olivier Sartenaer, Professor of Philosophy of Science at UNamur, SPiN brings together philosophers and scientists around a common vision: to develop a critical and accessible reflection on science in all its diversity..

Are we prisoners of our genetic heritage? Can filiation be reduced to genes alone? Can we escape our destiny? Existential questions we all ask ourselves, and to which Gaëlle Pontarotti, lecturer and researcher in the Department of Sciences, Philosophies and Societies at UNamur, sheds new light in her book Par-delà les gènes. Une autre histoire de l'hérédité, published last October by Gallimard.

The F.R.S.-FNRS has just published the results of its various 2025 calls for proposals. These include the "Credits & Projects" and "WelCHANGE" calls, as well as the "FRIA" (Fund for Research Training in Industry and Agriculture) and "FRESH" (Fund for Research in the Humanities) calls, which aim to support doctoral theses. What are the results for UNamur? Twenty-eight projects have been selected, demonstrating the quality and richness of research at UNamur. 

For its inaugural conference, the SPiN (Science & Philosophy in Namur) center will be joined by Claire Rommelaere, a lawyer and researcher at the Center for Bioethics at the University of Namur, and Aude Bandini, a philosopher of science at the University of Montreal, to take a critical look at the theme of "distrust of science." The urgency of addressing this issue is clear in our era, where, despite an overall stable level of trust in science, the parameters of public debate are frequently blurred by misinformation.Having had the opportunity to observe philosophers of science in their natural habitat for nearly fifteen years, Claire Rommelaere will share her thoughts on whether or not we should trust those who think about science.For her part, Aude Bandini will address a major problem that we all face at a time when the mass of available knowledge is such that it is impossible to acquire it on our own. Indeed, the socially distributed nature of knowledge generally leaves us no choice but to rely on the authority of experts, even on very important issues (such as health). However, when we rely on others in this way and follow recommendations that, due to our ignorance, we have no means of evaluating, we place ourselves in a relationship of "epistemic dependence" that conflicts with our aspirations for intellectual autonomy and forces us to ask ourselves a question whose answer may prove unbearable: is intellectual autonomy nothing more than a myth?Conference hosted by journalist Maïté Warland.Program:5:30-6:30 p.m. | Drinks at Quai 22 (Rue du Séminaire 22, 5000 Namur)6:30 p.m. | Claire RommelaereDistrust of philosophers of science7:00 p.m. | Aude Bandini Intellectualautonomy in the face of scientific authority: a headache for social epistemologyRegistration deadline: April 16.Free of charge. Register

A plant does not seem to have much in common with animals. Yet naturalists of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries attempted to study plants as if they were animals: they set out, for example, to find an equivalent to the circulatory or respiratory systems. Why did they feel the need to resort to analogical reasoning? What results did they obtain? And more generally, what is the value of this type of reasoning?On the agendaTuesday, May 5, 202612:15 PM – Welcome and light lunch1:30 PM – Introductory remarksThibault De Meyer (University of Namur): Why Analogy?2:15 PM – Session 1: Theory and Practice - Cristiana Oghina-Pavie (University of Angers): The analogy of pragmatic knowledge: actions and transactions in 19th-century horticulture and Quentin Hiernaux (FNRS / Free University of Brussels): The plant-animal analogy employed by A.-P. de Candolle’s physiology in addressing the issue of the sensitivity of living beings3:45 PM – Coffee break4:15 PM – Plenary Session 1 - Thierry Hoquet (University of Paris Nanterre): Is the plant/animal analogy valid?5:45 PM – End of the first day7:00 PM – Conference dinnerWednesday, May 6, 20269:00 AM – Welcome9:15 AM – Session 2: Relationships and Boundaries of the Living - Dario Galvão (University of Namur): Analogy and the Faculties of the Living: Animal Reason and Plant Sensibility in the Enlightenment and Ugo Batini (University of Poitiers): Understanding Humanity Through Plants: Analogy and the Metaphysics of the Living in Schopenhauer10:45 AM – Coffee break11:15 AM – Plenary Lecture 2 – Pascal Duris (University of Bordeaux): Plants as Humans. Analogy in Linnaeus and the Linneans12:45 PM – Lunch break2:00 PM – Toward New Disciplines - Vera Staetmanns (Ruhr University Bochum): Do Plants Think? Analogy in the Plant Psychology of Raoul Heinrich Francé (1874–1943) and Matthieu Amat (University of Rouen Normandy): Analogy and Homology: Transfers from the Life Sciences to the Cultural Sciences in the 19th Century3:30 PM – Coffee break4:00 PM – Plenary Session 3 - Aliènor Bertrand (CNRS / ENS de Lyon): “Les œufs du vent” and Their Descendants5:30 PM – Closing of the conference5:45 PM – End of the dayContact: Dario Galvao - dario.galvao@unamur.be

Ethics is practiced in hospitals. But ethics is also practiced in care and support facilities for the elderly and people with disabilities, as well as in pharmaceutical companies, research centers, and universities.We “practice ethics” in groups whose scope may be local, regional, national, continental, or international. We “practice ethics” by organizing conferences, conventions, meetings, roundtables, workshops, symposia, think tanks, and so on.But what exactly “do we do” in these settings? Is there really anything in common among all these groups, these settings, these collectives? It is not desirable to strive for a single model that would ignore the specific characteristics of the environments in which this activity takes place.But it is interesting and undoubtedly necessary to seek to better understand and define what each group does in this regard. What's on 9:00 a.m. Introduction9:30 a.m. Sharing of experiencesDarius Makindu - Kinshasa School of Public Health (DRC)Yannick Courtin, Jérôme Bouvy, Laurence Gillard - GHdC TeamHerimampita Rarivomanantsoa - University of Antananarivo (Madagascar)Nicky Sacré, Véronique Weber - La Maison Sainte-Joséphine (MR-MRS) in Theux and Résidence Bon-Air (MR-MRS) in Petit-RechainAlain Loute - UCLouvain, ELMAC research group on “places of connection” in mental health11:00 AM Break11:30 a.m. Discussion of the presentations12:30 PM Lunch1:15 PM Theatrical interlude: Compagnie Nicomaque2:00 PM Sharing of experiencesMarius Kedoté - Regional Institute of Public Health, BeninBruno Krug, Étienne Gourdin, Marie-Laure Cornet - Team from the UCL Namur Godinne University HospitalPatrick Robert, Tonino D’Arcangelo - La Galice (non-profit organization)Sami Richa - Saint Joseph University of Beirut, LebanonChristian Byk - UNESCO, Paris3:30 PM Break4:00 PM Discussion of the presentations5:00 PM Conclusions of the day5:30 PM End of the day In practice To ensure we can provide you with the best possible experience, we kindly ask for a contribution of €30, to be paid into UNamur’s BNP Paribas Fortis account at Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur (IBAN BE10 2500 0740 2704; Swift/BIC: GEBABEBB), with the following reference: “Last name, first name of the registered person CPO 4-16670-00 ETHICS Workshop Sept 26.”Contact personsLaurent RAVEZ - coordinator: laurent.ravez@unamur.beVéronique OROSE - Secretariat: veronique.orose@unamur.beRegistration is required. Sign me up Organizing Committee Catherine Bert (UNamur, Research Associate, Center for Bioethics, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Sciences, Philosophy, and Society; Director of the Health Division at the Léonard de Vinci University College)Charlotte Costenoble (UNamur, Assistant, Department of Sciences, Philosophy, and Society, Faculty of Sciences)Vincent Darche (UNamur, Research Associate, Center for Bioethics, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Sciences, Philosophy, and Society; Surgeon, CHRSM Meuse Campus)Albert Fox (UNamur, Research Associate, Center for Bioethics, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Sciences, Philosophy, and Society)Geneviève Guillaume (UNamur, Researcher, Center for Bioethics, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Sciences, Philosophy, and Society)Bruno Krug (UCLouvain, Clinical Professor, Chief of Clinic, Nuclear Medicine, CHU UCL Namur, Godinne Site)Sébastien Loix (UNamur, Research Associate, Center for Bioethics, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Sciences, Philosophy, and Society; Intensive Care Physician, HELORA Jolimont)Alain Loute (UCLouvain, Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Health and Society Research, Higher Institute of Philosophy)Darius Makindu (UNIKIN, Professor, Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Kinshasa, DRC)César Meuris (ULB, Associate Professor; Robert Schuman University College, Director of the Ressort Center)Véronique Orose (UNamur, Secretary, Department of Sciences, Philosophy, and Society, ESPHIN Institute, Faculty of Sciences)Laurent Ravez (UNamur, Full Professor, Center for Bioethics, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Sciences, Philosophy, and Society)Sami Richa (Saint Joseph University, Professor, Head of the Department of Psychiatry, Beirut, Lebanon)Claire Rommelaere (UNamur, Researcher, Center for Bioethics, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Sciences, Philosophy, and Society)

Our keynote speakers for 2026 are Professor Roosmarijn Vandenbroucke (Ghent University) and Professor Nelly Litvak (Eindhoven University of Technology). More information on the "Women in Science" website

The IPCC warns of the growing impact of global warming on water, with more frequent droughts and floods threatening global supplies. By 2050, 42% of river basins will be severely affected, and flood damage could quadruple in the event of 4°C warming. Although they bear little responsibility, the most vulnerable populations suffer the worst consequences. In Wallonia, recent climatic disasters and water pollution illustrate the stakes. To raise public awareness, an event is being organized in Charleroi with debates and screenings.Program17:00 | Introductory session Head of UNESCO Belgium Mr Aurélien Dumont, Secretariat of UNESCO's Intergovernmental Hydrological Programme, World Water Situation17:40 | Screening of the film "H2O, water, life and us: the Emergency"18:30 | Break18:45 | Lectures and debate Prof. Dr. Marnik Vanclooster (U.K.). Marnik Vanclooster (UCLouvain), "Situation en Wallonnie" Prof. Alfred Bernard (UCLouvain), "Normes et toxicologie" Debate Moderated by Prof. Karim ZouaouiBouin (UCLouvain). Karim ZouaouiBoudjeltia (ULB), with the participation of Aurélien Dumont, Marnik Vanclooster, Alfred Bernard.20:30 | Cocktail dinnerGRATULAR : Registration required: f.amer@wbi.beThe members of the "exact and natural sciences" Sub-CommissionBernard Feltz (UCLouvain, Chairman), Bertrand Hespel (UNamur), Marie-Geneviève Pinsart (ULB, CIGB), René Rezsohazy (UCLouvain), Frédéric Rychter (Secrétaire général), Olivier Sartenaer (UNamur), Didier Serteyn (ULiège), Anne Staquet (UMons), Marnik Vanclooster (UCLouvain), Karim Zouaoui Boudjeltia (ULB)

Flamure Ibrahimi is a Ph.D. student in service and marketing management at the NaDI-CeRCLe Research Center at the University of Namur (Belgium) within the EMCP Faculty, under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Wafa Hammedi (University of Namur) and Prof. Dr. Linda Alkire (Texas State University). She has just been awarded the prestigious ServCollab Scholarship 2026, an international distinction that recognizes and supports doctoral students whose work falls within the field of Transformative Service Research (TSR)—doctoral projects with high impact on society and humanity.

Abstract Predictive maintenance (PdM) is increasingly being used to improve system reliability, reduce downtime, and optimize operating costs in complex industrial environments through anomaly detection. As industrial systems become more complex, with components interacting with one another and monitored by ever-expanding sensor networks, anomaly detection faces new methodological challenges. In particular, there is a gap in the literature regarding anomaly detection using traditional machine learning (ML) methods based on a Single Label Classification (SLC) approach, which is unsuitable when multiple failures can occur simultaneously.Traditional anomaly detection approaches based on ML methods using an SLC formulation assume that each observation belongs to a single anomaly category. This assumption does not hold when multiple failures occur simultaneously on the same equipment, resulting in a loss of information. We begin by illustrating this limitation through a concrete example showing that using an SLC approach instead of a multi-label formulation degrades the classification of simultaneous anomalies. To address this issue, anomaly detection is reformulated as a Multi-Label Classification (MLC) problem, enabling the detection of multiple failures within a single time step. Following this reformulation, the issue of selecting multi-label classifiers suited to the context of Predictive Maintenance (PdM) must be examined. The general conclusion from the literature is that the performance of classifiers depends heavily on the context and that while there are many detection methods, none is universally dominant. Although in-depth comparative studies exist in the field of MLC, datasets from complex systems are absent from these comparisons, even though they exhibit specific characteristics such as multivariate time-series structures, significant label imbalance, and complex interactions between components.To address this gap, a structured and reproducible evaluation protocol is proposed to evaluate eight state-of-the-art ML methods in an MLC framework across three public industrial datasets. The results confirm that the performance of classifiers depends heavily on the characteristics of the dataset and that no single method consistently outperforms others across all scenarios. However, conducting this type of comparison for each new industrial context is costly in terms of time, computational resources, and data requirements, which limits its feasibility for real-world industrial deployment. The thesis also addresses this issue through dimensionality reduction and variable selection methods. PM systems generate large multivariate datasets in which only a subset of the variables is actually relevant for anomaly detection. A self-adaptive evolutionary strategy is proposed to perform wrapper-style variable selection and obtain a subset containing only the most informative variables. Experimental results show that reducing the variable space improves computational efficiency and, in most cases, anomaly prediction performance. A comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art metaheuristic approaches on three PdM datasets and five anomaly detection methods confirms its competitiveness in terms of predictive performance and the optimal size of the selected feature subset. Finally, feature space reduction not only optimizes the resources required for detection but also reduces the number of signals that technicians must analyze during root cause investigations. This simplification aims to strengthen confidence in the system. Finally, the thesis addresses the practical aspects of deploying detection methods in complex systems. Among these, there is a lack of trust and transparency among maintenance technicians and decision-makers. An analysis of the interpretability and robustness of anomaly detection methods is provided to directly contribute to their deployment in real-world conditions. First, the proposed variable selection strategy is evaluated on a public PdM dataset using SHAP-based explanations to verify the consistency between the selected variables and those identified as the most important by tools dedicated to interpretability. The results show that the selected variables are consistent with those identified as the most important by these tools. Furthermore, visual analysis of the most influential variables reveals that anomalies are associated with a limited and well-defined subset of sensor signals, which helps improve transparency and strengthen confidence in automatic detection systems. At the same time, it is necessary to conduct a study of the robustness of multi-label classifiers in controlled sensor degradation scenarios, including different types of degradation and various levels of severity. The results show that the performance of classifiers can deteriorate significantly, particularly in the presence of gradual drifts. To mitigate this effect, introducing sensor degradation during training appears to be a relevant strategy. Finally, this thesis proposes a structured framework for multi-label anomaly detection in complex systems, covering classification methods, feature space optimization, interpretability, and robustness. For each of these aspects, the thesis adopts an industrial perspective and takes into account the differences between controlled laboratory experimental conditions and the additional constraints of real-world complex environments. The jury Prof. Katrien Beuls - University of Namur, BelgiumProf. Elio Tuci - University of Namur, BelgiumProf. Patrick Heymans - University of Namur, BelgiumProf. Jenni Raitoharju - University of Jyväskylä, FinlandMr. Fabio Pinna - Telespazio, BelgiumMr. Vito Trianni - ISTC-CNR, Italy Sign me up

Sara Belghiti, a doctoral student at the University of Namur (NaDI-CeRCLe Institute) and a teaching and research assistant at the IÉSEG School of Management (France), has just been recognized by the AMS Review – Sheth Foundation Doctoral Competition for Conceptual Articles (DoCCA) 2026, one of the world’s most prestigious doctoral competitions in theoretical and conceptual marketing and management.