The research project “The Poetics of the Stadium: Banners, Chants, and Fan Shouts” aims to study the full range of discourses produced within the stadium and to examine their poetics, the practical conditions of their creation, dissemination, and circulation, as well as the social and political issues associated with them: What discursive registers are brought to life through fans’ speech? What micro-fictions do they sketch out? What are their rhythms? How is a tifo created? Who is responsible for its production? How are chants taught? What cultural references do they draw upon? What political affiliations do they reflect? How do they circulate?

From *Madame Ex* by Hervé Bazin to *Dans la foule* by Laurent Mauvignier, and from *Le Martyre d’un supporter* by Maurice Carême to *The Unlucky Ones* by Brian Stanley Johnson—not to mention a host of stories by authors such as Yamina Benahmed Daho, Péter Esterházy, and David Peace—the soccer stadium has often been the subject of fictional portrayals that alternately depict its passion and its flaws, and at other times bringing its specific chronotope to life through plays on antithesis (between rival fan factions, between expressions of support and hostility, between moments of fervor and those of silent despondency, etc.) to lend an epic dimension to the action unfolding on the field(1).

Beyond this fictional portrayal of the stadium, we would like to examine what the stadium itself reveals—the discourses it harbors and fosters, and the forms and imaginaries that develop within it and accompany the game. These are primarily the work of the fans, who—far from the image of the alienated consumer or passive spectator debunked by cultural studies and fan studies—engage in collective expression by drawing on an encyclopedia of insider knowledge involving codes, techniques, and know-how.

Verbally, they take the form of chants and songs, led under specific conditions and at well-defined rhythms by representatives chosen from within the ultras groups. In writing, they appear on tarps, banners, flags, scarves, and, sometimes, in fanzines.

Une banderole dans les gradins d'un stade de football

Because they leave a lasting impression and sometimes go beyond the stadium to make headlines, the most famous examples are those that rely on confrontation: those who employ this combative rhetoric often rely on insults and excess (consider the famous example of the banner unfurled by the Boulogne Boys’ fan section during the League Cup final between Lens and PSG in March 2008— “Pedophiles, unemployed, inbreds: Welcome to the Land of the Ch'tis”—but also the taunts that pepper every derby), while easily clearing themselves of accusations of violence, sexism, or homophobia by invoking folklore and humor. The stadium is also associated with a repertoire of chants—more or less stable and more or less identifiable (such as “You’ll Never Walk Alone” in Liverpool or “Les Corons” in Lens)—which, within each club, can draw on outside influences (there are countless covers and adaptations of “Horto Magiko,” a song originating with Panathinaikos that has spawned a vast tradition) and reactions to specific circumstances (“ “We lose every week, you’re nothing special!”” supporters of English teams going through a tough season sometimes chant—with self-deprecating humor—to dampen their opponents’ enthusiasm).

While these forms of expression are most often devoted to cheering on one’s own team and disparaging the opponent, they can sometimes take on a more political tone, despite the apolitical culture of sports(2) often claimed by its participants. In such cases, they readily target club executives and their management, sports authorities, or the repressive and security measures put in place to contain these demonstrations. This is undoubtedly because fans and activists are more alike than they realize and draw on numerous shared influences (3), which explains why the stadium has been, for over a century, an important site of political protest, far beyond sporting concerns, as Mickaël Correia has shown in his book *Une histoire populaire du football* (La Découverte, 2018), by focusing in particular on the role of Egyptian ultras during the Arab Spring or the struggle against Francoism among FC Barcelona fans—and as confirmed even today by expressions of support for Gaza coming from various stands around the world. The stadium thus constitutes an ambivalent space for expression—a venue for collective expression that is at once free, potentially transgressive, and heavily constrained; an outlet subject to threefold surveillance: sporting (in France, a referee can halt a match in the event of racist or homophobic displays in the stands), police, and media. What emerges there is a form of literature that is doubly unruly—in its forms and media (makeshift materials, handmade creations…), as well as in its content and manifestations—perceived as uncontrollable, impulsive, and herd-like, and thus often dismissed and delegitimized.

(1) For an initial critical analysis of this soccer-related literature, see in particular Jean-Marc Baud, Vincent Bierce, and Raphaël Luis (eds.), *Mythologies sportives d’aujourd’hui. Le football et ses langages*, Paris, Hermann, “Échanges littéraires,” 2021.

(2) See Jacques Defrance, “The Politics of Apoliticism: On the Autonomization of the Sports Field,” *Politix*, no. 50, pp. 13–27. URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/polix_0295-2319_2000_num_13_50_1084.

(3) See Jean-Charles Basson and Ludovic Lestrelin, “Toward a Political Sociology of Fan Culture: Reflecting on Activism and Partisanship Among Soccer Fans in Europe,” in Thomas Busset, Roger Besson, and Christophe Jaccoud (eds.), The Other Face of Fan Culture: Self-Regulation, Collective Mobilization, and Social Movements, Peter Lang, 2014, pp. 21–40.