While domestic violence is becoming an increasingly prominent topic in public discourse, this does not mean that it is fully understood. On the contrary. It was this observation that led to the creation of the biennial conference of the Association Famille & Droit, co-chaired by Professor Géraldine Mathieu and Professor Yves-Henri Leleu, which brings together family law professors from French-speaking universities in Belgium. Organized with the support of the “Children’s Rights” Unit at the Vulnerabilities & Societies (V&S) Center at UNamur and the SMAJ (Marche Service for Assistance to Litigants), it brought together 230 researchers, judges, lawyers, psychologists, and practitioners united by a shared conviction: to better understand a complex phenomenon in order to respond to it more effectively. This collective reflection led to the publication of the anthology *Intrafamilial Violence: Understanding, Identifying, and Taking Action: An Interdisciplinary and Systemic Approach*, published by Larcier-Intersentia and edited by Professor Géraldine Mathieu.

“There are topics that a society can never discuss too much, as long as it continues to learn and question itself,” says Géraldine Mathieu. One of the central themes of the conference and the book is precisely the call to “have the courage to be nuanced—not to downplay violence, but to better understand situations and develop more appropriate responses.”

Understand, name, act: these three verbs structure the book just as they structured the conference. Three verbs that, according to the professor, “emerged naturally,” as they reflect both an ethical and an intellectual imperative in the face of realities that “defy simplistic explanations.”

One of the book’s major contributions is that it places the concept of coercive control at the heart of its analysis. “It invites us to shift our perspective,” explains Géraldine Mathieu. “It reminds us that domestic violence is not limited to a few visible incidents, but can be part of a gradual dynamic of control and domination.”

This concept helps us grasp a reality that has long been underestimated: a person can gradually lose their freedom, self-confidence, or autonomy without there necessarily being any physical violence. Isolation, surveillance, control over finances or movements, systematic belittling… these are all mechanisms that build lasting control, the consequences of which can be just as devastating as physical violence. The book explores how this concept, now recognized within the Belgian legal system, compels the law to listen more closely to victims and to “take seriously realities that sometimes fell outside our usual categories,” explains Géraldine Mathieu.

The book also devotes significant attention to invisible forms of violence (psychological, economic, administrative, or digital), including those that continue after separation and those that affect children. “To name it is already to acknowledge it. And to acknowledge it is to enable better protection,” emphasizes Géraldine Mathieu.

These forms of violence pose a major challenge: they defy existing legal categories, often evade reporting mechanisms, and remain underdocumented. The book’s contributions aim to bring these forms of violence to light through statistical, sociological, and clinical approaches, while also examining the blind spots in public policy. As Géraldine Mathieu puts it: “Words are not just for describing the world. Identifying a form of violence means acknowledging what victims are going through and better understanding the mechanisms at work.”

In the face of this complexity, compartmentalized approaches reveal their limitations. The book brings together 25 contributions from academics, judges, lawyers, clinicians, and practitioners in the field, all sharing a common conviction: “The most relevant solutions emerge when everyone contributes their experience and is willing to learn from others.”

The law (criminal, family, property, and juvenile) is analyzed in depth at the Belgian, European, and international levels, but is constantly placed in dialogue with psychology, sociology, and practices in the field.

The conference embodied this same approach. By bringing together in one room professionals who do not always cross paths, it allowed new perspectives to emerge. “When professionals who don’t always follow the same practices take the time to listen to one another, new ideas emerge and everyone leaves a little changed,” observes Géraldine Mathieu. The outcome exceeded her expectations: for Marie-Amélie Delvaux, an attorney and lecturer at the Faculty of Law, the day was “eye-opening”: “We’re leaving with concrete tools; the speakers drew us into their cause.”

The book builds on this momentum by presenting innovative approaches and inspiring practices to improve the identification, prevention, and support of victims. 

The Vulnerabilities & Societies Research Center at UNamur takes a resolutely interdisciplinary approach to situations of human vulnerability, at the intersection of law, psychology, and the social sciences. It pays particular attention to vulnerable populations and fundamental rights.

Its unique character is based on a twofold goal: to produce rigorous knowledge and to foster dialogue between academic scholarship and practical fieldwork.

“Addressing serious issues with rigor, but also with enough openness to learn from others,” summarizes Géraldine Mathieu, co-director of the center.

Beyond research and teaching, V&S; sees itself as a meeting place between the academic world and the field, convinced that knowledge realizes its full value when it is shared and discussed. This mission is fully illustrated by this conference and the accompanying book.

Launched in 2010 by NARILIS (Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences), the “student-researcher” program is based on a simple yet ambitious idea: to enable motivated students to immerse themselves in research starting in their undergraduate years. The goal is not necessarily to train future academics, but to push students out of their comfort zones, to develop their ability to learn independently, and to tackle complex subjects methodically and autonomously. These are valuable skills, regardless of the career path they choose.

Today, this educational model is gaining traction beyond the NARILIS Institute. At the UNamur Law Faculty, Donaciene Quoirin tried the experiment last year as part of writing a scientific article alongside Géraldine Mathieu, a professor of family and juvenile law, and Bee Marique, a lawyer and teaching assistant. Her mission? To give children a voice. This year, she has joined Lisa Salmon in the CAPACITI project, focused on children’s rights, in collaboration with researcher Manon Brulard.

CAPACITI is a research project aimed at engaging children in learning about and advocating for their rights. Far from being a desk-bound endeavor, it involves going directly to meet with children—particularly in schools—to hear their voices and understand how they perceive their rights.

The students were therefore tasked with designing fun educational tools, leading workshops with classes, taking notes, and facilitating activities. 

“For example, we created a little game called ‘Agree, Disagree,’ using signs, and a picture game to match a right with its illustration… These are practical tools we developed in collaboration with Manon Brulard,” explains Donaciene.

Lisa, for her part, focused on developing a board game inspired by Monopoly and Trivial Pursuit, while actively participating in on-site activities. 

More recently, they have also contributed to in-depth research on the procedures for hearing children under Belgian law. This work will enable the creation of fun fact sheets for children to answer all their questions about how hearings before a judge take place.

What strikes Donaciene and Lisa is not only the intellectual depth of the project, but the human reality it reveals. During the workshops in schools, the children open up with disarming ease, sometimes on very sensitive topics. 

“We’ve been here for two hours, and they’re coming up to us to talk about very personal things. I found that pretty impressive,” Donaciene says.

Lisa, for her part, was struck by the way the children sometimes look at one another: “What struck me is that even among themselves, they can judge each other. Children trying to speak, not very sure of themselves, facing a group that judges…”

On the issue of rights themselves, the conclusion is clear: children know little, or misunderstand, their practical implications. “They’re for them and they’re essential, but they don’t know much about them,” Lisa sums up. Donaciene, for her part, observes two types: those who know they have rights but feel they aren’t respected much in the face of parental authority, and those who’ve never heard of them.

What makes this educational program particularly unique is also the nature of the relationship between the researcher and the students. Manon Brulard, the project’s principal investigator, is only three years older than Donaciene and Lisa. This closeness fosters a genuine, horizontal dynamic of collaboration, far removed from the traditional mentor-mentee model.

“I really want to treat them as full-fledged researchers. I give them meaningful tasks—tasks that will have a tangible impact. I don’t want to ask them to do work that no one will read,” Manon insists.

For her, working with student researchers also breaks the isolation inherent in research: “Research is a very solitary endeavor. Being able to discuss things after the sessions, to share ideas, is extremely enriching.”

The inclusion of the student-researcher status in the curriculum is no small matter. While Donaciene initially contributed on a volunteer basis as a student-researcher to the drafting of a scientific article, student participation in the CAPACITI project is now recognized as part of their legal internship, earning them 4 credits.

But beyond the credits, it is the experience itself that matters most. Donaciene puts it bluntly: seeing research from the inside, from its inception to its concrete outcomes, has opened her eyes to the profession of research. Lisa, for her part, regrets that the program is still not well-known enough: “If I hadn’t taken the Youth Law track, I would never have known this role existed.”

Both hope to continue the adventure next year and perhaps, one day, make research their career. Provided, they point out with clarity, that the criteria for entering an academic career do not close doors to students who are already rich in concrete and valuable experience.

Led by Professors Nathalie Burnay (sociology) and Michel Ajzen (management) from the Faculty of Economics, Management, and Communication (EMCP) at Sciences Po, University of Namur, this interdisciplinary project aims to conceptualize the ethics of care—“taking care” in French—within organizations and the conditions for its implementation to promote sustainability in the workplace. 

“For several years now, we have been witnessing a profound transformation of work, accompanied not only by a deterioration in working conditions but also by a search for meaning. More and more workers, whether skilled or unskilled, are no longer content with just a job: they are looking for work that is meaningful and suits them. " - Nathalie Burnay, Professor at the EMCP Faculty and researcher at the Transitions Institute.

In light of this observation, the pair of researchers explores the idea of care as a driver of sustainability in the workplace—that is, the living and working conditions that enable individuals to sustainably commit to a long-term professional career.

“The ethics of care is an emerging concept in management, sometimes overused under the term ‘benevolence.’ Our goal is to take a critical and rigorous look at this concept, drawing on the literature and empirical data.” — Michel Ajzen, Professor of Organizational and Innovation Management.

The SUScare project will span five years and will be structured around several phases: 

1. A review of the scientific literature to better understand the concept of sustainable work in a changing world;
2. A quantitative assessment to measure the current state of work sustainability in Belgian companies; 
3. In-depth interviews to understand how workers and managers perceive the issue of care in the workplace;
4. A case study to examine the conditions under which care can become a pillar of sustainability at work.

To carry out this work, Nathalie Burnay and Michel Ajzen will be supported by a multidisciplinary team consisting of two doctoral students—one in sociology and the other in management—as well as a postdoctoral researcher in the social sciences. 

The results of this research will take the form of a white paper for managers and a workshop with human resources professionals.

Since joining the Transitions Research Institute in 2024, the V&S; Center has strengthened its interdisciplinary approach. While law remains its foundation, dialogue with other disciplines (philosophy, history, political science, geography, etc.) is essential. “Law is indispensable for structuring society, but it often comes too late. It must be informed by sociological, anthropological, or medical analyses to truly drive change in norms,” emphasizes Stéphanie Wattier.

This openness allows the 47 researchers at the V&S; Center to better grasp the complexity of the phenomena they study and avoid a purely normative approach. It also fosters fruitful collaborations with external partners: grassroots organizations, NGOs, public institutions, judges, lawyers, and policymakers. These ongoing exchanges fuel research and strengthen its societal impact.

Each year, the Center organizes a conference centered on a unifying theme, chosen based on contemporary societal issues. These gatherings serve as key opportunities for dialogue among researchers and practitioners in the field. They often lead to the publication of collective works, designed as tools for reflection and action.

To mark its tenth anniversary, the Center organized a conference dedicated to a subject that is both sensitive and essential: “Combating Sexual Violence.” This choice came naturally. “Many of us were working, directly or indirectly, on this issue. And despite its prevalence, sexual violence is still under-addressed in legal scholarship,” explains the Center’s co-director.

The anniversary symposium brought together legal professionals, specialized organizations (“Breaking the Silence” and “Lawyers Victims Assistance”), researchers from other disciplines, judges, attorneys, and institutional representatives. This diversity reflects the Center’s philosophy: bringing together different perspectives to better understand and take action. Discussions focused on a legal analysis of sexual violence experienced by various groups, including children, the elderly, people with disabilities, and victims of armed conflict; but also on the settings where it occurs, whether in the family, online, or within institutions such as the Catholic Church, higher education, or the medical field.

This work resulted in a collective volume published by Larcier, titled “Combattre les violences sexuelles.” The choice of title is no accident. “We wanted to adopt a clearly committed stance. The role of legal doctrine is not only to describe the law, but also to shed light on phenomena that have been silenced or trivialized for too long,” explain Stéphanie Wattier and Géraldine Mathieu, coordinators of the book and co-directors of the Center.

The publication highlights two major findings: women and children remain the primary victims of sexual violence, and the law, while indispensable, remains insufficient on its own. The contributions underscore the difficulties related to evidence, compensation for physical and psychological harm, as well as the limitations of an exclusively criminal justice response.

Through the Center’s conferences and publications—whether addressing gender-based violence from a legal perspective or the rights of intersex people—a common thread emerges: the conviction that prevention is essential. “Punishment isn’t enough. We need to act upstream—raise awareness, educate, and change mindsets. The law can support these changes, but it can’t do everything,” insists Stéphanie Wattier.

It is precisely this interplay between the law, on-the-ground realities, and prevention that has been the strength of the Center for Vulnerabilities and Societies for the past ten years. By giving a voice to victims, frontline workers, and researchers, it helps to change norms, practices, and, gradually, society itself. After ten years of existence, the Center continues to pursue its mission: to put the law at the service of people, so that it becomes a true lever for protection, recognition, and social transformation.